MICROSOFT EXCHANGE EMAIL $4

MICROSOFT EXCHANGE EMAIL $4

DOWNLOAD === https://urllio.com/2tCWwm

If your organization is looking to get a cloud email service, Microsoft offers several subscriptions that include Exchange Online. If you begin researching you may see references to both Exchange Online Plan 1 and Exchange Online Plan 2. Which to choose?

For example, if an employee responded to a phishing email and was asked to send their tax file number by email. Having a DLP policy to protect this type of information from being shared would prevent possible data leakage.

Does your company need to manage voicemails in their mailbox or perhaps need an auto attendant service, you need unified messaging (UM). UM allows mailbox owners to receive voicemails in their mailbox and manage them.

Other than the convenience of managing voicemails via the mailbox, the auto-attendant is handy, The auto-attendant is like a digital phone receptionist that answer calls and provide options or menus that users can then press on their phone.

Exchange Online supports features for personal, group, and resource scheduling which seamlessly integrates with email, contacts, and tasks. Your employees can share their calendar details or view several calendars simultaneously, allowing them to schedule meetings during shared open time.

Microsoft is one of the most popular email providers (opens in new tab), and users can get a Microsoft email account through either Outlook or Exchange Online. While Outlook is a decent email client (opens in new tab) on its own, Exchange Online subscriptions have a variety of helpful features for businesses.

That said, Exchange goes above and beyond Outlook when it comes to security. While Outlook merely filters spam emails into the Junk folder, Exchange Online Protection is far more flexible. Admins can actively filter messages based on corporate policies or government regulations in order to ensure compliance throughout the organization.

At $8 per user per month, Plan 2 adds a few advanced features, including data loss prevention and hosted voicemail. Along with raising the primary mailbox storage limit to 100 GB, Plan 2 provides unlimited storage via the In-place Archive.

Using an Outlook.com account is a great alternative for your current POP3 or IMAP account if you want to sync your emails, contacts and calendar items with multiple devices such as your desktop, laptop, netbook, tablet or smartphone. It behaves a lot like a personal (hosted) Exchange or Office 365 for Business account but for free.

Setting this up is relatively quick and easy but there are some pitfalls to notice. This guide walks you through the entire process of setting up an Outlook.com account with your own current email address and how to transfer all your current data.

A Microsoft Account is basically your username to make use of various Microsoft services such as Outlook.com, OneDrive, Xbox and even Windows 8 or Windows 10. This username can be any existing email address you already own or a new Outlook.com address.

If you already have an @outlook.com address, then you can use that one or create a new one. If you already have a Microsoft Account for your current email address, it is important that it also has an @outlook alias configured with it.

With the Outlook.com account now configured in Outlook, you can start transferring your current email, contacts and calendar items to the Outlook.com account so that you can sync them to multiple devices.

Moving your emails is quite easy; Select all your messages in the Inbox with CTRL+A and move them to the Inbox of your Outlook.com account via drag & drop or use the Move command on the Ribbon. You can also use the keyboard shortcut CTRL+SHIFT+V or right click on your selection to move your messages.

The costs depend on the country that you live in but currently a single mailbox costs $4 per month. As the domain owner, this also provides you with lots of management options and you have the additional benefit of being able to share email, calendar and contact folders between your colleagues as well as creating shared mailboxes. You can find out more here: Compare Microsoft Exchange Online plans. (You can switch your language and geographical location at the bottom left of the page.)

An email server, on the other hand, is a server application designed to manage the sending and receiving of emails on the back end. Email servers equip users with a host of different tools that can help them email more securely, more reliably, and/or more efficiently.

While Microsoft Outlook masters the front end of the email experience, Microsoft Exchange handles the back end. Subscribing to an Exchange Online plan will also give you access to a suite of other features and services.

You can share one-time static calendars, known as Calendar Snapshots, in an email message. Or you can publish calendars to a special web server designed to host calendars in the iCalendar format. The benefit of the latter is that when you change the calendar in Outlook, the changes are synchronized to the web server. This enables those who use an Internet Calendar subscription to see the latest information automatically.

Press Briefing by Dana PerinoJames S. Brady Press Briefing Room Video Press Briefings Audio 12:40 P.M. EDTMS. PERINO: A quick readout. The President and Prime Minister Tuskdiscussed defense issues this morning, including missile defense, airdefenses there in Poland, Iraq and Afghanistan. And the Presidentreiterated the United States' commitment to Polish security as a friend andNATO ally, and they discussed concrete cooperation in this regard.A quick preview for tomorrow. Tomorrow the President will give a speech atthe Convention of Religious Broadcasters in Nashville.The President willgive the first of several speeches on the situation and way forward in Iraqand Afghanistan in the lead up to the Petraeus-Crocker report, and the NATOsummit, which is coming up at the end of this month. The President willdiscuss the God-given gift of freedom, and outline the ideological strugglein the Middle East.The President will discuss also the nature of the enemy in Iraq andAfghanistan, including some of their latest tactics, and he will give anupdate on the progress of the surge in Iraq. So that's for tomorrow.Q Dana, two topics, please.Can you elaborate a bit more on that"concrete cooperation" that was promised today? What exactly is the UnitedStates promising to Poland in exchange for the missile defense interceptor?MS. PERINO: Well, I don't have specifics in terms of finances or makeup ofthe support in terms of resources, because Secretary Rice and SecretaryGates are going to be collaborating and then talking with the Polishgovernment to see what they need. One of the things is that as we wouldwith any ally, we would help them evaluate their defenses. There has beensome concern expressed by the Polish about their air defense system; itneeds to be modernized. Secretary Rice said that she'd talk to SecretaryGates about it. And the President and the Prime Minister spoke today abouthow the United States would be committed to helping them, as we would anyother ally, in that regard.But it could take a while to find out after the analysis how much it'sgoing to take in order to help them on that, in that regard.Q Is it fair to say that it is all part of one package, in the missiledefense system?MS. PERINO: I think the way we would describe is, it's certainly not aquid pro quo, because, as we would with any ally, we would help themmodernize a different part of their defense system. In this regard, thePoles have indicated that their air defenses are something that they thinkare lacking, so we will take -- undertake an analysis and commit to workingwith them this year.Q One other topic. Could you comment on this suit filed by the HouseJudiciary Committee to force Miers and Bolten to provide information?MS. PERINO: Sure. This is -- I was realizing it was about a year ago thatthe administration offered to House Democratic leaders the access tovarious administration officials that they wanted to hear from in regardsto that issues of the U.S. attorneys. They turned us down on that. So nowit's been almost a year of wrangling on that front, and now they'vecontinued to focus on partisan theater. They've filed suit in court. Theconfidentiality that the President receives from his senior advisors andthe constitutional principle of separation of powers must be protected fromoverreaching, and we are confident that the courts will agree with us.John.Q Has the President given the Vice President any specific benchmarkshe's looking for from his trip to the Middle East? The President outlineda little bit, but you had made it clear earlier this morning that he wantedthings to hurry up in the Middle East peace process.MS. PERINO: No, I wouldn't say that the President has to give the VicePresident any benchmarks. The Vice President understands fully what we'retrying to achieve there, and the President is grateful that he's agreed togo. He has an ambitious trip, starting this Sunday. He'll travel toseveral different countries, and he has many different topics that he willcover.One of the most important is certainly trying to help the Israelisand the Palestinians as they continue to talk with one another to get to apoint where they could define what a state would look like.And in addition to that, he'll travel to Saudi Arabia; I'm sure that energyissues will come up there. He'll be talking about Iraq and the progress ofthe surge and the importance of making sure that the security gains thatwe've had do not reverse themselves.So he's got a wide range of topics that he'll cover on his trip.Q But not anything specific, like, let's have the settlement issueresolved by this date, for instance.MS. PERINO: If there is, I'm not aware of it and I don't -- they haveprivate conversations.Q Will he repeat the request to the Saudis to ask OPEC to raise oilproduction, a request which was made by the President and turned down byour friends, the Saudis?MS. PERINO: I'll refer you to the Vice President's office for exactly whathe will bring up. But certainly the position of the United States and thePresident is that we believe that more supplies should be out there on themarket. And the President does want OPEC to take into consideration thatits biggest customer, the United States, that our economy is weakened, andpart of the reason is because of higher oil prices; we think that moresupply would help. And I don't anticipate that the Vice President wouldhave any other message than that one.Q So he will, obviously, then, have that message.MS. PERINO: I'm not -- I can't tell you exactly what the Vice President isgoing to say and I'm not going to -- I'll let him have his meetings andthen they can read them for you while you guys are on the road.Q Dana, the Secretary of State was just in the Middle East, she's justback -- I mean, was there something -- what was there that she didn'taccomplish that the President thinks the Vice President -- and is this anyway, would you say, a comment on the state of the peace process? Is this arescue mission?MS. PERINO: Kathleen, I think that that is really -- I think it's a littlebit outrageous to suggest that. Last week, if you were watching, whatSecretary Rice was able to do was pull them back from the brink and havethem recommit to having discussions amongst themselves. That was anaccomplishment.If we weren't sending someone there to help the negotiations keep going,I'm sure the criticism from this room would be, "Why aren't you sendingsomebody else?Why isn't the Vice President going?" The President iscommitted to this issue. He has asked the Vice President to go and help tocontinue working with the Israelis and the Palestinians, while -- and inthe meantime, next week, General Fraser, who is our man on the ground whois helping implement the road map, he is there working very hard. He willactually have a meeting with all the parties, either Thursday or Friday ofthis week. Then the Vice President will go. And then in mid-May thePresident returns to the region where we will continue on.So this is a reiteration of the President's commitment, and certainly, byany measure, Secretary Rice had a very good trip last week, especiallybecause she was able to bring them back to the table.Q How much will the perceived threat from Iran figure in on the VicePresident's trip to the region?MS. PERINO: Well, as I said earlier, the issue of Iran and their pursuitof a nuclear weapon and their interference in some of their neighbors'governments is a concern to the people in the region, and a concern to theUnited States, to the United Nations Security Council, which includes theEuropean Union, the EU-3 in particular. So I do anticipate that that willbe a topic that's on the agenda. But he doesn't -- I don't know ofanything specific that he's been asked to -- any messages he's been askedto carry.Wendell.Q Dana, what does it say that the missiles we want to put in Poland thatare not a threat to Russia, we are willing to provide Poland missiles toprotect from Russian missiles?In other words, if we're going to providepatriots to keep -- to prevent a Russian attack on the missile interceptorswe want to put in Poland, we are now providing a threat to Russianmissiles, yes?MS. PERINO: I don't know of anyone -- except maybe some in the media -- noone is suggesting targeting Russia in this regard. We do not want to denyany ally the ability to defend themselves, and some allies ask us for helpin making sure that their defenses are above board, that they are modern. And in this regard, in this particular case, Poland has said that theydon't think their air defenses are good enough.There might be other aspects of their military that they would like to seeimprove, but no one is suggesting attacking Russia. In fact, we believethat the missile defense system would deter threat from the rogue nationsthat we're talking about. And it certainly is not aimed at Russia. Andthere is nothing that 10 interceptors placed in Poland could do tooverwhelm all of what Russia has. And so I think, by any objectable [sic]measure, this is not at all a target of Russia.Q But we are willing to provide Poland with the means to protect thoseinterceptors from an attack from Russia.MS. PERINO: Who is suggesting that Russia is going to attack anybody? Certainly no one from here is.Q We would not be thinking about putting Patriots in Poland were it notfor Russia's threat to re-target missiles on Poland if we put theinterceptors in Poland.MS. PERINO: I really don't know where you're getting that, Wendell. It'snot at all in any of the discussions that we've been involved in.Q That was certainly a part of the security guarantee.MS. PERINO: No, it's not. I just sat in on the meeting.Q It is not? We are not going to provide Patriots to Poland to protectthe interceptors?MS. PERINO: I just told Ben Feller that I don't know exactly what thepackage will look like at the end of the day. Secretary Rice has said thatshe'll work with Secretary Gates, and it could take several months to dothe analysis and decide what we think we can do to help them modernizetheir air defenses.Q Let me try one more time --MS. PERINO: But no one is suggesting that we should defend -- that Polandneeds to defend themselves against Russia.Q Is that not precisely what the Polish Prime Minister said he neededprotection for, those interceptors -- because Russia had threatened tore-target Poland if we put them there?That is not -- that was not theconversation today?MS. PERINO: In that regard -- when they talk about missile defense, it'snot about Russia. And when he talks about air defenses, it's that theirsystems, they feel, are not modern, and that they want to modernize it. But no one was talking about Russia attacking Poland. If that is a concernof the Polish government, I'll refer you to them and they can talk aboutthat. But what we are talking about is, overall -- having an overall gooddefense system, and that includes modernizing their air defenses.Roger.Q On Poland, is the goal to have a modernization agreement in place oragreed to by the end of the President's term?MS. PERINO: Sure, absolutely.Q A couple on Iraq.Why a speech to religious broadcasters to lay outthe Iraq policy case?MS. PERINO: Well, the President was invited by the religious broadcastersthis year to come and give a speech. The topic was ours to choose, but thePresident -- one of the things he'll be talking about is, as I said, theGod-given right to freedom, that is given to everybody. And the Presidentwill talk about the importance of the missions that we have underway inAfghanistan and Iraq. But in addition to that, he will provide an update.And as you know, we're getting closer to the fifth anniversary of the warin Iraq, we're getting closer to the Petraeus-Crocker report, which willcome April 8th and 9th on Capitol Hill. And then we have the NATO summit,which is very important in regards to the issues in front of NATO rightnow, including expansion.Q What are the administration's latest cost estimates on the war? Areyou familiar with the Stiglitz article that came out over the weekend --the Nobel Prize-winning economist, former Clinton advisor, Joseph Stiglitz-- $12 billion a month he's now estimating.MS. PERINO: I'm not going to dispute his estimates. I don't know exactlywhere he gets all of it. I think some of the things that he looks into interms of veterans' care, that we're going to take care of our veterans intothe future, those types of things have to be included.But it's very hardto anticipate, depending on conditions on the ground and circumstances, howmuch the war is going to cost.I think that right now we are fighting thiswar in the 21st century; we have our soldiers who need modern equipment notonly to fight and to complete the mission that they're given, but also toprotect themselves.For example, I don't think anybody is arguing that our men and women whoare out there on the battlefield shouldn't have access to the MRAP vehicles-- those vehicles are very, very expensive -- but they've helped save livesand prevent injuries, and that's just one example of the many things thatwe are spending money on.But in addition to that, you -- we have to ask ourselves what the cost of-- what the cost would be of doing nothing, or of ratcheting back whenwe're not ready to ratchet back, in terms of making sure that Iraq does notbecome a safe haven for al Qaeda, making sure that Afghanistan doesn't fallback into the hands of the Taliban.There are long-range incentives for us to be able to -- that we should keepour eye on, which is making sure that our military has all that they need,that we're helping these young democracies, and that we consider theimportance of a modern health care system that can help veterans when theycome back to the United States, if they need help either from an immediateinjury or over the course of their lives because of the -- what they'vegiven to this country.And so fighting terror is expensive and we are committed to making theinvestments necessary to keep people safe.Q So what's your estimate of the monthly cost of the war?MS. PERINO: I don't have it. We'll have to -- you know, OMB could give itto you, but obviously it's very expensive. And one of the things thatwe're waiting on right now is for Congress to take action on a supplementalbill that would fund our troops right now. It's $108 billion and we'rewaiting for Congress to take action on that. We're going to call on themto do that soon.Go ahead.Q Dana, I'm puzzled about the United States' position about the latestIsraeli settlement announcement. You said this morning that the Israelisbelieve that they would take some steps on settlements and stay within theroad map. The President said during the press avail with the PrimeMinister that the obligations of the road map are clear. Does the UnitedStates agree with that position that the Israelis have advanced, that theycan do and stay within the road map?MS. PERINO: I don't -- well, I think -- I never said that those two thingswere -- that we necessarily agreed with the Israelis on their position. And it's -- reasonable people can disagree with different aspects of it. The President believes that the settlement issue is one of the thingsthat's a sticking point to getting to the next step in the negotiations. From Israel's point of view, it's whether or not the Palestinians can starttaking care of their -- start taking care of the rockets that are comingacross from Gaza, but also just overall security. You saw last week whereyou had the tragic shooting in Jerusalem.The Israelis and the Palestinians were both operating under several yearsof built-up mistrust, and we're trying to build that back up. And one ofthe things that the President thinks needs to happen is that -- just taketwo of those issues of the road map, the settlements and then security onthe Palestinian side, they've got a long way to go, there's a lot more workto do, and no one is moving as fast as the President would like them to.Q So when you say reasonable people can disagree, I'm sorry to keepbeating up on this, but do you agree then with the Israeli position thatthat's okay under the road map?MS. PERINO: That they expand settlements? Look, I think that there aresome that were announced before, and there are some that are currentlyunder construction, others that were going to be under construction but theconstruction never started. So I think it's a little bit more complicatedthan just black and white, because there's a lot of different factors thatgo into the different settlements that they're talking about.Q Dana, back on what Peter was talking about. How has inflation since2003 impacted the cost of the war?MS. PERINO: I'm sure it's had an impact, but, April, I'm not an economist,and we'll either try to get you an answer or refer you to OMB.Q Next question. The hearing about pharmaceuticals in the waterway, EPAhas put out a statement. What is the President saying about this,especially as there was a concern last year about what was -- the drugsthat were found in Chinese seafood, and he was very concerned about that --what is he saying about our waterways, finding drugs there?MS. PERINO: Well, certainly he has confidence in the EnvironmentalProtection Agency, and especially Administrator Johnson. The United Stateshas some of the safest drinking water in the world, and EPA is committed tomaking sure that that remains the same from here on out. However, thisissue of pharmaceuticals being dumped into either toilets or down the sinkbecause people might want to make sure that their medicine cabinets arefree from old medicine or medicine that they no longer need, and maybe theywant to keep it away from the hands of children -- they think the best wayto get rid of it is to flush it.But the EPA has several different ways that they advise people on how toget rid of medicines in a safe way; one of them is certainly take advantageof take-back programs that pharmacies will have. But in the meantime, EPAis on top of the issue; they're working with the different regions,municipalities, to make sure that we are able to, through our cleandrinking water system, make sure that it's safe for people. And right nowEPA is saying that across the board we have some of the safest drinkingwater in the world.Q So it's just as simple as that, no more dumping of pills down the sinkor in the toilet?MS. PERINO: Well, at this point I'll just refer you to EPA, who willanalyze the results of a study that was released yesterday. They takegreat care to make sure that our drinking water is safe. But certainlyit's a concern that people would be throwing away pharmaceuticals in anunsafe way.Go ahead, Victoria.Q Dana, is the Vice President going to meet with the Israelis andPalestinians separately, or is he going to try to get them together?MS. PERINO: I think right now it's set up for a separate meeting, but as Isaid, later this week General Fraser was inviting them to all meettogether. It's either Thursday or Friday.Q And would you dispute the $12 billion a month?MS. PERINO: I just said, Victoria, that I'm not. But I'm not validatingit either. I'm not taking his -- just as we don't do book reviews, I'm notgoing to do a review of every former Clinton administration's official's --a study that they put out. I'm just not going to do it. I said what Isaid, which is that it's expensive, we're fighting a war in which we'refighting it with modern equipment that our soldiers need in order to keepthemselves safe and to complete their mission.It's very expensive. We're in an ideological struggle. This is agenerational issue; it's not something that's going to be solved in a yearor two. And we know that, and the President was committed to making surethat we invest now, and invest in the right way. And the question iswhether or not the next President will think that fighting the war onterror is worth it, and the President set us on a footing to do so.Go ahead, Paula.Q The President has repeatedly said in the past that oil companies don'tneed any existing, or any new, tax breaks because of the amount of profitsthey're making. Well, with prices of oil going up above $100 a barrel,gasoline prices expected to go up to $4 a gallon, why does the Presidentthink that the existing tax breaks should be maintained for oil companies?MS. PERINO: I think that -- if you're talking about the bill that's infront of the Congress right now, I think you need to take a little bit of acloser look at it. This bill would target just five companies. We don'tthink that that is fair. We also think that it's the exact wrong thing todo if you want to lower prices for Americans who are paying a lot at thepump. The wrong thing to do would be to increase taxes on those oilcompanies that are providing this product in America.So obviously the President had opposed the -- I think it's called themanufacture -- what's it called, the manufacturing tax credit?I can'tremember the exact name, but the bill that passed in 2005, he did opposethat. But this is a fundamentally different bill, and we do oppose it, andwe have a statement of the administration position. It's basically becauseit is unfair just to target these five companies, and counterproductivebecause it would lead to rising prices.Q Does the President feel, though, that there is sufficient amount oftax incentives out there right now to encourage additional alternativeenergy development?MS. PERINO: Well, I think that obviously the President has been verysupportive of alternative and renewable fuels.He's been supporting thatin terms of tax incentives. And you see it across the board -- it's notjust the tax incentives that are helping, but entrepreneurs who arefiguring out that Americans want different choices. And so we have avariety of new technologies that are underway, both from alternative fuelsand renewable fuels; both on the fuel that -- like the -- replacing thegasoline that you put in your car, as well as to what type of electricityyou use when you flip on the switch at home.So there's lots of different things that we're doing across the board, butit's going to take concerted effort and investment -- that this Presidentstarted -- and be maintained over a long period of time. And in themeantime, the other thing we need to do is to increase domestic explorationand production in environmentally safe ways here in the United States.Go ahead.Q Going back to the Mideast, President Abbas seems to imply that thereis a deal between Hamas and Israel, whereby Hamas will stop firing rocketsand Israel will stop assassinating the leaders of Hamas. Your comment onthat? And also, would you encourage Egyptian mediation in this regard?MS. PERINO: I haven't heard that from President Abbas. I'm not going tonecessarily take your word for it; I'll let them speak for themselves.ButI would point to the fact that General Fraser is bringing the Palestiniansand the Israelis together later this week in order to have conversations,and I'm sure that security and the rocket attacks is going to be a part ofthat. And obviously Secretary Rice, having been in the region and Egyptjust last week, and then asking her Under Secretary [sic] David Welch to goback to the region and talk to Egypt to try to help alleviate the situation-- it's something that we're engaged in.Mark.Q Yes, Dana, back to the speech tomorrow. You said, the first of aseries of speeches leading up to Petraeus and Crocker and the Iraqanniversary. It sounds like sort of the major campaign getting underway. Is the President worried that he is going to come under increasing electionyear pressure to order more troop withdrawals that he doesn't think isappropriate?MS. PERINO: Obviously the President of the United States, as theCommander-in-Chief, is always under pressure from lots of different places,but he makes decisions based on what he thinks is right and based on whathis commanders on the ground are telling him he needs.And so he will begetting a series of briefings in the lead-up to these meetings, both atNATO and the Petraeus-Crocker testimony.He was just at the -- what they call "The Tank" at the Pentagon lastFriday; I anticipate that he'll be back one or two times before then. Andthen we'll have a chance for the President to speak about Iraq andAfghanistan leading up to, I guess, that week of April, the 7th, when thetestimony arrives.Q I guess I'm just trying to think of the strategic imperative here tomake the case in repeated public waves over the next few weeks, leading upto --MS. PERINO: Look, the President thinks about Iraq and Afghanistan often,and at this time it's really important -- obviously, any time there's ananniversary it focuses attention on the issue, and that's absolutelyappropriate, and where we can celebrate the recent gains, but also make thecase that those security gains aren't irreversible. We need to make surethat we're taking the action that Ambassador Crocker and General Petraeusand his commanders on the ground suggest that we need.In addition to that, we have the war in Afghanistan, and we need to makesure that we are working with our NATO allies to make sure that the troopshave what they need and that we have enough troops. Obviously that's goingto be an issue coming up at the next -- in the next couple weeks as we leadup to the NATO summit.And I think there's -- the EU meets next week andthey're going to be talking more about NATO and the possible expansion;there's applications for expansion of NATO. And all of these issues aregoing to be very important leading up to it. And the President -- we'veidentified some time on the calendar where the President can speak toissues of great importance to the American people.Go ahead, Les.Q Thank you, Dana; two questions. Reuters reports that our Customs andBorder Protection Commissioner admits that the U.S. may not meet the goalof essentially stopping illegal immigration from Mexico by 2011. And myquestion: What does the President believe would help most in this effort,more Border security personnel, more miles of border fence, or moreenforcement of immigration regulations nationwide?MS. PERINO: The President thinks that all of those issues are important,but he would add another measure, which is a temporary worker program sothat we could have a legal mechanism for people who want to cross theborder and work in America, but also want to go back home.Q Governor Rick Perry of Texas has just written a new book entitled, "OnMy Honor: Why the American Values of the Boy Scouts Are Worth FightingFor." And my question: Does the former governor of Texas who is nowPresident agree or disagree with this title?MS. PERINO: I don't know if he's even aware of the book. And GovernorPerry was around last week and talked to him. I'm going to move on.Q Wait a minute --MS. PERINO: No, Les --Q -- you don't want to leave the impression --MS. PERINO: Les, stop.Q --that the President opposes both his fellow Texas governor and theBoy Scouts of America, do you?MS. PERINO: Of course he doesn't.Go ahead.Q The Spanish elections that Prime Minister Zapatero has won on Monday-- is President Bush going to congratulate him, or has he congratulated him--MS. PERINO: I expect he'll be sending a message to him, sure.Go ahead.Q Back to oil and Cheney. Why is Cheney likely to be more successfulthan the administration has been so far in getting OPEC to increase itsproduction?MS. PERINO: Who suggested that?Q Well, because he's going to ask again; why is he likely to besuccessful?MS. PERINO: First of all -- who said in this room that he's on the missionto go and ask again? He didn't -- I didn't say that. I said, will energybe on the agenda? It absolutely will be. The question was, will he have adifferent message than the President of the United States. No. But as Isaid last week, OPEC made a decision, it was one we were disappointed with. We don't agree with it. We think that they would be better served and theworld would be better served if there was more supply.But never did Iimply that the Vice President would be what you described.Q Would you consider -- would he consider asking just Saudi Arabia tounilaterally increase its production?MS. PERINO: Obviously, Saudi Arabia will have to make that decision on itsown.Q Thanks, Dana.MS. PERINO: Thank you.END 1:05 P.M. EDT Printer-Friendly Version Email this page to a friend AfghanistanAfricaBudget ManagementDefenseEconomyEducationEnergyEnvironmentGlobal DiplomacyHealth CareHomeland SecurityImmigration International TradeIraq Judicial Nominations Middle EastNational SecurityVeteransmore issues NewsCurrent NewsPress BriefingsProclamationsExecutive OrdersRadioSetting the Record Straightmore news January 2008 | December 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | July 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 News by Date | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 | March 2001 | February 2001 | January 2001AppointmentsNominationsFederal Facts | Federal StatisticsWest Wing | History 781b155fdc